Comments on: WWE SmackDown vs. RAW 2009 http://www.dpadmagazine.com/2008/11/13/wwe-smackdown-vs-raw-2009/ Pressing all the right buttons Thu, 18 Mar 2010 18:57:45 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=abc hourly 1 By: frifri http://www.dpadmagazine.com/2008/11/13/wwe-smackdown-vs-raw-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-1304 frifri Sun, 23 Nov 2008 08:38:20 +0000 http://www.dpadmagazine.com/?p=1714#comment-1304 you're an idiot if you enjoyed TNA LOL. SvR is better than TNA if we are basing the game as a wrestling simulation. Yes, SvR is more realistic as a wrestling game than TNA's mortal kombat/street fighter style of gameplay and physics you’re an idiot if you enjoyed TNA LOL.

SvR is better than TNA if we are basing the game as a wrestling simulation. Yes, SvR is more realistic as a wrestling game than TNA’s mortal kombat/street fighter style of gameplay and physics

]]> By: juan http://www.dpadmagazine.com/2008/11/13/wwe-smackdown-vs-raw-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-1261 juan Wed, 19 Nov 2008 04:45:36 +0000 http://www.dpadmagazine.com/?p=1714#comment-1261 Agreed. While TNA is not perfect, its move transition is much more smooth and I got a couple of friends to play the other day and we played for a long time. been a while I have enjoyed wrestling games. TNA is far more enjoyable while not having all the bells and whisltes WWE 2009 has. WWE 2009 is just boring after a bit, the moves feel robotic and matches feel very slow and tedious. Agreed. While TNA is not perfect, its move transition is much more smooth and I got a couple of friends to play the other day and we played for a long time. been a while I have enjoyed wrestling games. TNA is far more enjoyable while not having all the bells and whisltes WWE 2009 has. WWE 2009 is just boring after a bit, the moves feel robotic and matches feel very slow and tedious.

]]>